EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PEMBANGUNAN EKONOMI: SEBUAH KAJIAN KOMPARATIF
Keywords:
Islamic Economics, Economic Development, Comparative StudyAbstract
This study aims to analyze the relationship between Islamic economics and economic development through a comparative approach. Islamic economics, as a value-based economic system rooted in Islamic principles, emphasizes justice, balance, public welfare (maslahah), and the prohibition of riba (usury), gharar (uncertainty), and maysir (gambling). Meanwhile, conventional economic development primarily focuses on economic growth, per capita income increase, and industrialization. This research compares both approaches in terms of objectives, instruments, success indicators, and their impact on social welfare. The method employed is a literature review using a descriptive-analytical approach based on relevant scholarly sources. The findings indicate that Islamic economics is not solely growth-oriented but also prioritizes equitable distribution, social stability, and moral-spiritual sustainability. Therefore, integrating Islamic economic principles into economic development strategies has the potential to foster a more inclusive, just, and sustainable development model.
Downloads
References
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). DEPENDENCY AND DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA. University of California Press.
Chapra, M. U. (2000). THE FUTURE OF ECONOMICS: AN ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVE. The Islamic Foundation.
Chapra, M. U. (2001). WHAT IS ISLAMIC ECONOMICS? Islamic Development Bank & Islamic Research and Training Institute.
Frank, A. G. (1967). CAPITALISM AND UNDERDEVELOPMENT IN LATIN AMERICA. Monthly Review Press.
Hasan, M., & Dridi, J. (2010). THE EFFECTS OF THE GLOBAL CRISIS ON ISLAMIC AND CONVENTIONAL BANKS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY. IMF Working Paper, WP/10/201. International Monetary Fund.
Kahf, M. (1999). THE PERFORMANCE OF THE INSTITUTION OF ZAKAH IN THEORY AND PRACTICE. International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 1(1), 1–22.
Lucas, R. E. (1988). ON THE MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
North, D. C. (1990). INSTITUTIONS, INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE. Cambridge University Press.
Ricardo, D. (1817). ON THE PRINCIPLES OF POLITICAL ECONOMY AND TAXATION. John Murray.
Romer, P. M. (1990). ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Rostow, W. W. (1960). THE STAGES OF ECONOMIC GROWTH: A NON-COMMUNIST MANIFESTO. Cambridge University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). DEVELOPMENT AS FREEDOM. Alfred A. Knopf.
Smith, A. (1776). AN INQUIRY INTO THE NATURE AND CAUSES OF THE WEALTH OF NATIONS. W. Strahan and T. Cadell.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A CONTRIBUTION TO THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC GROWTH. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). OUR COMMON FUTURE. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eny Latifah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
